Notes From Nature Talk
Oh! Hmmm ok
Wow, good sleuthing
This one probably needs to be pulled
This one has limited data and what is there is hard to figure out.
Oh wow! So noted and will work with SERNEC to get this out of the pool!
not sure? might reflect some nest structure?
No kidding on zoom-happy! Good one to report back to SERNEC providers!
Hmmm still might be good to transcribe the label as recorded. Maybe it is a historic site?
woah! these labels have their own fascinating - sometimes sad - stories beyond just the biodiversity.
I second "Janzen!!!" unrolled label or no
Is that date "04" and if so, I assume 1904? (Not 2004)
I think the new name (1997) is an annotation/amendment that reflects that the old one was synonymized. Use the new one IMO
This one has two things to note. One is the 5 mi N (of) Sin! The other is the weird date construct which I assume is 8/9/70-8/15/70
+1 vicinty Stuarts Draft, but the rest is... hard
and wow, fixed!!! Go Zooniverse!
pushed this to a ticket for fixing!
much missing data, Skipping
Ha! I wish there was a way to find out and I hope it was botanical!
What do with "reared from" data?
ASCII codes typically cause problems downstream when trying to publish these data. I will check on best practices here!
Any guesses on date? I am assuming 5-1-1976 not 1-5-1976...
wondering about diacriticals and how we deal with 'em
sideways label is hard to read. Probably not worth having a rotate option?
Date is month/year but no day - we need a way to enter just two fields not all three...
Rock Creek, California is not specific enough to locate to a county so skipping unless I am missing someone
I noticed the same issue with some bugs. I think leaving blank or saying unknown are both ok, but probably prefer just leaving blank.
Moorehead is still the locality and the malaise trap (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaise_trap) describes the sampling method
This one has a Det.. by J. R. Powers and a data but no collector, right? Or should we assume Powers was also the collector?
Is this tag torn? What to do in this case? Skip or transcribe?
This one has no locality. Should we skip these preferentially or still transcribe what we can?
Yeah we have had some problems getting the year fields all up and working!
Interesting! I am not sure that the science team knew we had some of these outlier records!
2nd record I tried #calbug