Notes From Nature Talk

Subject: ANN0000lon

Subject ANN0000lon Full subject data (JSON)

Comments

  • jland by jland

    Do we transcribe the most recent determination, and/or the original?

    Posted

  • darryluk by darryluk

    Transcribe what's on the label ie the original

    Posted

  • T-M by T-M

    I think I read somewhere the most recent determination should be used.

    Posted

  • T-M by T-M

    http://talk.notesfromnature.org/#/boards/BNN0000003/discussions/DNN000007u

    Posted

  • darryluk by darryluk

    That actually says yes, but and maybe. As in we like the most recent.... but even the original is invaluable....

    Posted

  • T-M by T-M

    Yes. I wonder if they simply don't care about the quality of the data. Otherwise they would give us clear rules how to handle such cases.

    Posted

  • T-M by T-M

    Or maybe this is just some strange kind of social experiment? 😉

    Posted

  • tmeconverse by tmeconverse

    I usually put the latest determination first and then "not whatever is the original one" in parentheses afterwards.

    Posted

  • alfresco by alfresco

    @T-M I think what the reply in the link means is that if unsure then even the original identification is better than nothing; I'd use latest

    Posted

  • T-M by T-M

    Yes, that's what I think, too.

    I use the latest, if it's clear. But if there is just some scribbling with pencil without date, I ignore it.

    Posted

  • T-M by T-M

    I think the latest determination has the highest chance to be the most correct one. Event if it might be wrong in some cases.

    Posted

  • T-M by T-M

    After all, it's not our job to know if a determination is outdated or even wrong, so we have use the one with the highest chance.

    Posted